All attempt to assess this assassination. Mine is very different. I "got" Charlie first time and was unconcerned about the monetary component. His intellegence and gift were overtly obvious.
I also got that Erika is evil personified.
4 secs of looking at her countenance and demeaner is all it took. The rest is simple corroboration.
The details are and will remain obscure. C Owens brings alot of receipts.
One of the qualities I love about you is you are a dog with a bone once a subject peaks your interest. Grateful for you! This article was eye opening as I haven't heard anything previously re: shaped charge nor how the physical evidence was immediately destroyed. I've questioned the truth behind Charlies murder and your article brings new depth to it. I do pray the truth comes out and soon as I believe Charlie was a Prophet of our time & he is greatly missed.
I would like to suggest a separation between the conspiracy theory or theories of Charlie’s death and his wife’s behavior.
You’re wondering as a grieving widow how she can act the way she has. That is because you are not familiar with evangelical culture.
In that culture a woman is not allowed to be a leader, no matter how gifted, and must at least appear to take a submissive role. The exception to this is the wife of a celebrity pastor or leader of a para-church organization who dies with no apparent heir (meaning son) to take over.
The wife then is anointed/ appointed to bravely step forward to continue the ministry/organization. How is this possible? Evangelical culture provides a shell of triumphalism that provides for no allowed grief of which your correctly perceived too quick and easy forgiveness is a sign.
She has taken on that role, stepped up to be a symbol of continuity and this includes fund raiser. For normal folks she would be allowed to wear black even a vail, but not the queen who has a triumphant role to fulfill. Hence the photo opportunity with the president and other political and evangelical leaders.
Of course she will pay an emotional price for this and so will her children. Of course she will never be allowed to re-marry, being sexually attractive but neutered by her culture.
Triumphalism is a powerful form of denial that has its reward with public adoration and financial reward.
As to the figures like Candice stepping forward that has its public rewards also. Besides who wants to believe that a stupid kid with low self esteem and armed with a rifle and seeking public recognition could possibly pull off this abhorrent act? Oh wait, we have plenty of examples of that from Butler to all those school shooting to the assassins of public figures like the UH executive. As for me, I’ll grieve for our sick gun loving society and await the jury’s verdict.
Thank you for this insight. It explains much. I'm keeping my observations on Erika to only what I know, which is the first few weeks after a sudden loss. How she has emerged post-that, well, I obviously can't relate but that's neither here nor there. What is unequivocal are the hard facts surrounding this investigation. When there are no answers or even attempts to address them, it's fertile ground for theories and alternative explanations.
It is important for “ground truth” to be revealed in major, highly concerning events, both for the practical functioning of the government and for the legitimacy of the public’s trust in institutions.
Why it matters for the U.S. public
1. Democratic accountability
2. Public trust and legitimacy
3. Better policy decisions
4. Protection against misinformation and “truth decay”
5. Moral and ethical reasons
Revealing ground truth in major, highly concerning events is important because:
It enables real accountability and democratic choice.
It protects and rebuilds public trust.
It leads to better policy and fewer repeated mistakes.
It counters misinformation and truth decay.
It honors the moral right of citizens and victims to know what actually happened.
Without ground truth, the public’s understanding of the event is essentially calibrated to something other than reality, which distorts every subsequent decision, debate, and reaction.
I have been following you since the beginning and have always trusted your insight until this article. In light of the overwhelming evidence this week against Tyler Robinson I would hope and pray that you would update your article.
Zack Degregorio from Wolves and Finance has proposed similar theories. His latest podcast on YouTube discusses them as well.
All attempt to assess this assassination. Mine is very different. I "got" Charlie first time and was unconcerned about the monetary component. His intellegence and gift were overtly obvious.
I also got that Erika is evil personified.
4 secs of looking at her countenance and demeaner is all it took. The rest is simple corroboration.
The details are and will remain obscure. C Owens brings alot of receipts.
One of the qualities I love about you is you are a dog with a bone once a subject peaks your interest. Grateful for you! This article was eye opening as I haven't heard anything previously re: shaped charge nor how the physical evidence was immediately destroyed. I've questioned the truth behind Charlies murder and your article brings new depth to it. I do pray the truth comes out and soon as I believe Charlie was a Prophet of our time & he is greatly missed.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.
- William Casey, CIA Director
(from first staff meeting in 1981)
Erika is the first widow I’ve seen mourn her husband’s death with fireworks.
I would like to suggest a separation between the conspiracy theory or theories of Charlie’s death and his wife’s behavior.
You’re wondering as a grieving widow how she can act the way she has. That is because you are not familiar with evangelical culture.
In that culture a woman is not allowed to be a leader, no matter how gifted, and must at least appear to take a submissive role. The exception to this is the wife of a celebrity pastor or leader of a para-church organization who dies with no apparent heir (meaning son) to take over.
The wife then is anointed/ appointed to bravely step forward to continue the ministry/organization. How is this possible? Evangelical culture provides a shell of triumphalism that provides for no allowed grief of which your correctly perceived too quick and easy forgiveness is a sign.
She has taken on that role, stepped up to be a symbol of continuity and this includes fund raiser. For normal folks she would be allowed to wear black even a vail, but not the queen who has a triumphant role to fulfill. Hence the photo opportunity with the president and other political and evangelical leaders.
Of course she will pay an emotional price for this and so will her children. Of course she will never be allowed to re-marry, being sexually attractive but neutered by her culture.
Triumphalism is a powerful form of denial that has its reward with public adoration and financial reward.
As to the figures like Candice stepping forward that has its public rewards also. Besides who wants to believe that a stupid kid with low self esteem and armed with a rifle and seeking public recognition could possibly pull off this abhorrent act? Oh wait, we have plenty of examples of that from Butler to all those school shooting to the assassins of public figures like the UH executive. As for me, I’ll grieve for our sick gun loving society and await the jury’s verdict.
BTW, I’m normally a fan of your posts 😊
Thank you for this insight. It explains much. I'm keeping my observations on Erika to only what I know, which is the first few weeks after a sudden loss. How she has emerged post-that, well, I obviously can't relate but that's neither here nor there. What is unequivocal are the hard facts surrounding this investigation. When there are no answers or even attempts to address them, it's fertile ground for theories and alternative explanations.
You could well be right.
.
It is important for “ground truth” to be revealed in major, highly concerning events, both for the practical functioning of the government and for the legitimacy of the public’s trust in institutions.
Why it matters for the U.S. public
1. Democratic accountability
2. Public trust and legitimacy
3. Better policy decisions
4. Protection against misinformation and “truth decay”
5. Moral and ethical reasons
Revealing ground truth in major, highly concerning events is important because:
It enables real accountability and democratic choice.
It protects and rebuilds public trust.
It leads to better policy and fewer repeated mistakes.
It counters misinformation and truth decay.
It honors the moral right of citizens and victims to know what actually happened.
Without ground truth, the public’s understanding of the event is essentially calibrated to something other than reality, which distorts every subsequent decision, debate, and reaction.
Keep up your push for that ground truth!
Sorry, I find this entire post ridiculous and frankly reprehensible. Sorry, that Erika doesn’t grieve like you.
These theories border on the absurd and the ridiculous. The raging anti semitic Candice Owen’s brings no receipts just monetized speculation.
The evidence is there, you are not !
This is way out there...but I think you would be interested. The evil empire knows no bounds...
https://elizabethapril.com/video-post/december-30th-2025-monday-live-stream-on-youtube/
Will check this out!
I have been following you since the beginning and have always trusted your insight until this article. In light of the overwhelming evidence this week against Tyler Robinson I would hope and pray that you would update your article.
I definitely will as soon as I can get a hold of what is presented.
I should mention that you can watch her videos for free (as a "seeker"), but you still must sign up for them.